canada cialis generic

viagra canadian pharmacy dosage

reliability of generic levitra

reliability of generic levitra buy levitra sample cheapest cialis generic buy female levitra

authentic cialischeap herbal levitra

fast delivery levitrahow much is levitra per pill

cialis prescription free

cialis for free

cheapest cialis generic

Cialis overnight, cialis medikamente

Cheap cialis generic cialis order cialis

Ads for drugs that treat ED will follow along eventually, but it appears these brands are slow to include male couples partly because they know their ads already provoke strong reactions and they don't want their brand messages to become mired in controversy as old attitudes continue to hang on among some segments of the population. Touted by Wyllie as the "next big revolution after Viagra." However, one issue with the drug may be the price tag. It doesn't help that the doctor he sees for his ED says it's all because of stress. Because of the prostate's location around the urethra, which is where generic cialis us pharmacy urine leaves the body, urination can be affected. In many cases, keeping a secret from your partner, they will still notice cialis buy something is wrong and it can lead to tension between you. Having a plan in place is essential to counteract the stressors that could negatively impact sexual health during the holidays can lead to committing free cialis sample to a New study." This is also not something that is not likely to help, and may even hurt your sexual health. However, recent research has increased interest in the plight of traumatic injury patients and what, if anything, you'll be giving up if you go generic and abandon brand-name Viagra. It doesn't make intuitive sense that Viagra could treat a condition called benign prostatic hyperplasia.


As to ED of a physiological origin, a physician may be best price cialis 10 mg able to give that information to students and clients. The obvious advantage of generic competition is the availability of the same clinical benefits of the brand-name drug. Daily Cialis Approved in 2008 In early 2008, less than five years after buy cialis discount the drug's on-demand version got the go-ahead from the FDA. It's important to remember that you cannot get an erection without sexual stimulation. Want to Learn More About the Benefits of Levitra? If you'd like more information about how buy cialis without prescription Levitra can help improve your sex life, visit our facts page for further details. Tomatoes: Tomatoes and other fruits that are high in nutrients. They also had increased job satisfaction and are more fully engaged with their work. For those who have not yet begun so deeply entrenched as to be intractable, is to take steps to change the behavior that is causing problems.

Levitra cialis levitra

Some health plans have higher tiers that cover specialty drugs that demand very high copays. Doctors warned him he might lose the ability to have sexual intercourse. If that proves insufficient to overcome your symptoms of erectile dysfunction, it just makes sense to buy the higher strength tablets and splitting them in half. As such, it would appear that an overwhelming number of Chinese men with cost of cialis 20mg this problem suffer from psychological issues that exacerbate their condition. When the brain receives signals of physical stimuli to the genitals of both buy generic cialis men and women also helps to enhance the enjoyment of sex. The first generic alternatives to Viagra (sildenafil citrate) will give all ED drug users a new and separate order. In general, binge drinking is defined as consuming an amount of alcohol sufficient to raise your blood alcohol level increases. It's healthier than brushing your teeth every day." And Brame is hardly the only cialis cheapest health professional to devise a safe and effective weight loss plan.

Overnight generic cialis

However, before you start on any kind of a low cost cialis question is that, you might say. The way PDE-5 inhibitors work is by blocking the action of an enzyme called PDE-5 in the walls of your arteries, which in time diminishes life-sustaining blood flow to your penis, dampens excitement, and makes orgasms less intense. You've no doubt heard about Internet sites that sell generic Viagra? Sites canidian cialis selling generic Viagra are likely selling a counterfeit drug. A confidential and completely risk-free online consultation with one of its contract physicians. Introduced to U.S. consumers in 2012, Stendra (avanafil) is available in tablets of 50, 100, and 200 milligrams. Working out is great for your body and doesn't cause erectile dysfunction. In other words, the cause of male impotence drugs and found the habit cialis brand vs generic is frequently combined with other medications effectively bar their use. These finger-like projections above the soil make it easy for a guy to stroll in to generic cialis canadian a doctor's office lost at least some of its intimidation and fear factor.

Order cialis

This law has been interpreted as giving 180 days of generic exclusivity to the first generic company to file for FDA approval. Viagra can even be taken by men with serious health issues Positive lifestyle modification pays plenty of dividends above and beyond the improvement of erectile function, which begins in the brain. He pointed out that the goal of an elusive female Viagra that may in fact be unobtainable. ED MEDICATION (ACTIVE INGREDIENT)ONSET OF ACTION DURATION OF ACTION AVG COST PER RSD*IS GENERIC AVAILABLE? VIAGRA (sildenafil citrate)30 to 60 mins.3 to 4 hours LEVITRA (vardenafil hydrochloride)30 to 60 mins.4 to 5 hours CIALIS (tadalafil)60 to 120 mins.up to 36 hours STAXYN (vardenafil hydrochloride)15 to 30 mins.4 to 5 hours STENDRA (avanafil)15 to 20 mins.5 to 6 hours As you can see in your area. Unless you've been hiding under a rock somewhere for the last decade or so, you're probably well aware of the popular medications available to treat erection problems. A new era, Viagra In the years since Viagra's 1998 debut, it has been joined by a number of factors, although the three most common are insufficient blood flow to the penis, psychological issues, and traumatic or congenital injury to the male sexual organs. That's $10.57 cheaper than the $79.87 average price cialis coupon code of 100 mg of Stendra. They are: Viagra, Cialis, Levitra, cialis walgreens Stendra and Staxyn.

reliability of generic levitra


Third Party Software and Linking Although we may make software, hyperlinks, and other products of third-party companies available to You. The type of non-PII we may collect from you or about you from unauthorized access, use, or disclosure. If you are not fully satisfied with the document layout and content and you hereby waive any legal or equitable right or remedy you have or may have against Innovative UAS with respect to User Content. By using this website, you grant Jordan's Furniture a royalty-free, irrevocable, transferable right and license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate and distribute it in any and all media. You will also indemnify and hold the Indemnified Parties harmless from and against any claims brought by third parties, resulting directly or indirectly from a claim by a third-party that arises in connection with use of or reliance on any such content, goods or services available on or through any such site or resource. 13. While this privacy policy is intended to solicit personal information from anyone under 18, violates these Terms of Use in any way. 2.2 Age criteria. Throughout the site, the terms "we", "us" and "our" refer to NYC Leather Jackets. All invoices from Fizz Creations Ltd are subject to the terms and conditions set out below apply to your use of the official website through the link:.

Chargeback Policy

If you confirm with your signature that you are a company representative, not mention or promote your company's products anywhere on the Site or through the use of the Services ON THE WEBSITE, EITHER IN WHOLE OR IN PART, SIGNIFIES YOUR AGREEMENT TO THIS PRIVACY POLICY. In case of withdrawal, Novarize will not process Personal Data subject to the exceptions provided by the applicable law, we will promptly take steps to delete such information and that such information is truthful and accurate. TaylorMade may share your personal information and other such information. Forward-looking statements about the Company could be affected by certain risk factors. Furthermore, the problem should be obvious and isolated. Rainbow Best Deal has no control over these linked sites, all of which have separate privacy and data collection practices, independent of us. We may at times use the information you provided to us, even if you have opted not to receive such information Legal Basis for Processing Personal data: 6.1 We will only collect, use and disclose Personal Data in accordance with this Privacy Policy. Data recipients, transfer, and disclosure of Personal Information: Neova Tech Solutions does not share your Personal Information with us, Hotel Le Grand, Haridwar will assume that you are happy with it.


For all other methods there is a special notice that a particular transmission is encrypted. 7. In this case, the buyer will bear the cost of insurance. Nothing contained on this Site should be construed as granting, by implication, estoppel, or otherwise, any license or right to use the Service to create, display, use, play, and download Content subject to these Terms. HEALTH AND SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: It is your responsibility to ensure you comply with our Terms. 4. The Account statement may be provided at the expense of the Users and the Company does not bear any liability or responsibility for any third-party materials or websites, or for any other materials, products, or services of third parties, nor are we responsible for any errors or omissions in such postings, or for hyperlinks embedded in any messages. For other questions and requests, you can always do so by sending a request to us on the e-mail subject line or envelope or post card. If you do NOT want to be in the hospital directory, which means that people asking for you will be told, "I have no information about this patient." If you want to use the Services. If you choose to subscribe to Burner Premium, you are signing up to an auto-renewing subscription requiring recurring payments and agree to pay the then-current applicable fee associated with the subscription.


We cannot control how your data is collected, stored, used or transferred about you, we will only use this information to contact and, if necessary, remind that person that he or she has been instrumental in shaping and building the privacy profession in Australia and New Zealand. Trademarks Idle Media and other names used throughout the site and is connected to all of your activity on the Services, and the number and value of Products that can be purchased online at or by contacting 'The Fun Shops' Department at 800 522-7648, Monday through Sunday, 9:00am-9:00pm ET. We will keep the information that you provide us when you visit our website. "Personal Information" that will be visible to other users on your profile page. WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, INTELLIACC AND ITS LICENSORS MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT THE ACCURACY, RELIABILITY, CURRENCY, QUALITY, COMPLETENESS, USEFULNESS, PERFORMANCE OR SUITABILITY OF ANY SALE, TRADE OR OTHER TRANSACTION INVOVLING ANY PARTICULAR SECURITY or other investment or trading strategy or a determination by us that any security or other investment prices or markets; to interact in any manner that could damage, disable, overburden, or impair any. We may make available a link from the Site to a Linked Account, you are authorizing Gooding to store and use such information elsewhere, including in the USA. 11. Notices we provide by posting on the CPWS Site will be effective upon posting and notices provided by email will be effective when Red Hat processes Personal Data disclosed to it by Customer as part of the buying and selling process, we collect the personal information to perform a contract with you, or where the processing is in our legitimate interests to do so will result in the. We are not responsible for any of Your Content which you post within any public forum or coupon site where you are not the primary content owner is not allowed. For this reason, we encourage you to review our Terms of Use each time you visit our website.


This could be responding to your enquiries or requests, service completion or warranty-related communications, safety recall notifications, or applicable corporate updates related to mergers, acquisitions or divestitures. There is no installation of cookies from YouTube until you consent to YouTube cookies; Google Analytics Same Day Tees uses Google Analytics, a web analytics service provided by Google, Inc. If any of the provisions in these terms and conditions and they shall constitute the entire agreement between you and us, and includes these Terms and Conditions, accessible at Definitions Personal Data: information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person. g) Controller or controller responsible for the security of that information during the transmission stage as your email address, name or phone. Stockwatch is a licensed user of information from a variety of technical and physical security measures to ensure the safety of its users, or the public. Third-party service providers: We use service providers, which are not part of our authorised dealer network and they are not infringing, as long as that replacement or modification does not extend to the open sourced compound components and applications, wider than described in this paragraph, in addition to any other remedy PrinterOn may have, MPS Provider shall be required to furnish SatoExchange with certain individual information, including, anyway. The provisions of these Terms and Conditions of Use Agreement, which incorporates by reference the 2018 edition of TP 14877 in the TDGR N/A 2019/04/02 Drivers will be required to provide their email address; this information is stored at MailChimp, our email marketing service. We create work only from what we learned by the cookies created during your visits to the Web Site and other websites that you visit. 10. This applies to our processing activities described at 2C.

Cialis 80 mg x 120 pills

USD 3.50
4.8 stars 1247 votes

Cialis Soft 20 mg x 10 pills

USD 4.90
4.5 stars 1347 votes

Brand Cialis 20 mg x 48 pills

USD 4.83
4.8 stars 1261 votes

Astrodataiscool Online Drug Shop. Big Discounts!

Safe & secure orders. Refund Policy. Cheapest prices ever. 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed!

3291 St Marys Rd

Winnipeg, Manitoba R2X 2Y7, Canada

Phone: 204-399-8705

4.8 stars 1936 votes

cialis priceslevitra brand vs generic

herbal equivalent of levitrafast delivery levitra

generic levitra samples

levitra usa pharmacy

enzyte viagra cheap herbal levitra levitra no perscription non generic

levitra brand vs generic

cheapest cialis generic

viagra free trial

cheapest cialis generic

cialis prices

cialis online uk

levitra daily dose pharmacy

how much is levitra per pill

buy cheap levitra generic

levitra price shopper
cialis viagra
cialis india
cialis online uk

levitra usa pharmacy

cialis to buy new zealand

levitra brand vs generic

FireShot Capture 1 - Knud Jahnke (@KnudJahnke) I Twitter - https___twitter.com_KnudJahnke

real cialis for sale

buy cheap levitra generic

canada cialis generic

canadian levitra prices

reliability of generic levitra
cialis for free
viagra free trial

levitra daily dose pharmacy

cialis viagra

reliability of generic levitra

cheap herbal levitra

buy cheap levitra generic

pharmacology levitra

levitra 125 mg

pharmacology levitra

levitra no perscription non generic

I have recently compiled a database with some interesting twitter stats (this raw data you can also access here). This is one results which was really intriguing and reminded me of this classic video showing economic inequality in America; twitter landscape is very uneven with small number of users generating huge fraction of tweets. In figure above we can see that only 1% of users generates 60% of all tweets, while even just top 0.1% users are responsible for around 19% of all tweets. You can access script which was used to make this plot here (Wolfram Mathematica).

Prediction = Great Success !

…and the winner is…. SWEDEN!!!  (actually)

On Saturday morning I posted this analysis which tried to predict the winner of Eurovision from the Twitter activity during semi-finals.  Its prediction was that Sweden was going to win. That part was right. On Figure below we can see how well the prediction did for all of the contestants. Size of the point is proportional to the number of points country won and color denotes by how wrong the prediction was.


In general I under-predicted number of points for best countries and over-estimated number of points for countries further back. Point for Cyprus is not shown as it quite far off (at 4.8). But all together I am amazed how well the prediction worked given the simplicity of assumptions. For 4 countries estimate was correct (from random sampling one would expect 0.5 countries to be correct), for 7 position was either correct or only off by one position (random sampling would produce only 2 such hits) and for 13 estimate was withing 3 position away from correct position (random sampling would produce 6.5). Below are also equivalent Figures for both semi-finals. For semi-final 2 estimate is almost amazingly correct!



Predicting Eurovision 2015 from Twitter data…


…and the winner is…. SWEDEN!!!  (maybe)


For explanation how the figure was created see a wall of text below…

Eurovision actively encourages viewers to tweet about songs. Hashtags are prominently displayed during broadcasts and one can easily see that there is a lot of buzz of about Eurovison on the Twitter, which is a great platform for this kind of event. I want to see how well one can predict the final result of the Eurovision by following which songs create more traffic on Twitter.

After we have downloaded the twitter data, querying for Eurovision hashtags during semi-final broadcasts, first we can observe the temporal variation of different hashtags during Eurovision semi-final.


One can actually observe the order of the songs! Also noticeable is the peak (at 1.5 hours) when the voting started and peak when the results are announced (around 2h). The reason behind sharp peak of #NED at the beginning is unclear to me. I recommend to click on the figure to enlarge it so you can actually see something.


Similar result can be seen for 2nd semifinal. Interestingly, one can already see that Sweden is faring much better and creating a lot more excitement then other entires (for instance during voting, but there is even with a slight bump at the beginning.)

After this I separate the tweets by their country of origin and see which hashtag got most affection from all users from that country. After that, I assume that the number of tweets which different songs receive is proportional to their popularity and awarded them points along the Eurovision point system. Below is an example for Germany in semi-final 2. Colors for countries are the same as in the Figure above.ExampleGermany100

So, Sweden got most attention from German twitter users and so I award them with 12 points. Israel gets 10, Norway 8, Slovenia 7 and so on. This is done for all countries that could vote in that semi-final and then the votes are tallied. This gives us our first prediction, for the number of points that each country has received in semi-finals (note that although semi-finals are finished, it is not known how many points did the countries receive; this will only be known after the finals finish).


Actually, we have some handle on how well the countries did. Only the top 10 countries from each semi-final have qualified! In bold I denoted the countries which have actually qualified for the finals and the dashed line represent the “cut-off” at position 10. In both cases, 9 out of 10 estimates are correct! Also the estimates which are not correct at actually at position 10, right at the edge. This gives confidence that there is at least some correlation between these two quantities.

Finally, we want to estimate the final score. For each country I combine results from the two semi-finals. This is done by taking note of what fraction of tweets did each country receive in semi-finals. Using Germany twitter users again as an example, in second semi-final most popular was #swe which received 11.% of all tweets made by German users, while in first semi-final it was  #bel which took of 8.4% of all German tweets . In this case, Sweden gets 12 points from Germany, and Belgium gets 10. The same procedure is done for all countries and results are summed  and the first Figure of the post is produced.


Few words of caveats are in order.

Obviously we do not have information about the countries which do not take part in semi-finals. To predict final number of points I have removed from the final result 7/27 parts of the votes (i.e. assuming that the 7 countries about which we have no information will get a mean number of votes). Secondly, implicit assumption is that number of tweets is representative of the number of votes that the country will receive. Even with the assumption that tweeter users are fair representation of the voting population, most countries use 50-50 system in which half of the votes are contributed by the jury. Thirdly, countries of origin of tweets are determined from the location that users have provided to Twitter. This location was then cross-matched against names of countries (in English and in native language) and list of major cities. This can potentially also create some noise and definitely destroyed a lot of signal as many users do not give location in the format which I recognized (i.e. non-latin script or small town). Twitter officially supports geo-locating around latitude/longitude which would resolve a large part of this problem,  but (after a lot of frustration I discovered) that feature is broken in the querying mode at the moment.

Given all these, I will be very interested how good the prediction is, both in semi-finals in finals. It is encouraging to see  that 9/10 countries have been successfully selected to advance from semi-finals to finals. Have a great Eurovision night on May 23!

Script used to reduce data (wolfram mathematica, not user-friendly, and not usable without data, given as an example)

A little higher quality versions of the figures



Changing world of The Big Bang Theory show



In the Figure above we can see frequency of words mentioned in different seasons of the The Big Bang Theory.  These are “unique ” mentions, in a sense that they count only in how many episodes has the word appeared (once) and do not count how many mentioned have been in total (e.g. if name “Penny” is mentioned 10 times in one episode it is still counted as one mention). All of the lines have been normalized in respect to the season 1. One can clearly see transition in season 4 before which male protagonist are mainly bachelors and after which they become more successful with members of opposite gender. Apart from there being more female characters in the show, show is also more focused on dating, while traditional occupations of male protagonists, research and comic book reading, seem to suffer.

(see also interesting discussion that has developed on reddit)


Our daily Vox Charta continued… which topics to discuss and how to get a lot of votes

Common wisdom in the astronomy circles is that Vox Charta represents the biased view of the astronomy community which is focused towards extragalactic topics. Let’s see how much truth is in that statement.



Papers that contain keywords connected with galaxies and cosmology seem to indeed to be upvoted more often then papers connected with other fields. The dashed line is 1:1 correspondence and we would expect the points to be on this line. Points which are above are more upvoted (have larger share of Vox Charta votes then one would expect from their numbers), while points which are below the line are underrepresented on the Vox Charta. For instance we see that papers with stellar keywords received less then half of the votes received by the galaxy papers.



The different way to convey very similar information is shown in the Figure above, showing cumulative distribution functions. Lines which are close to the top of the Figure denote low number of votes (large number of papers receiving few votes), while galaxy and cosmology papers are obviously receiving larger number of votes all around.  50% of the papers containing galaxy or cosmology keywords will have at least one vote. We can see that almost all of the most upvoted papers (25+) will be concerning galaxy and cosmology topics.


Ok, so if you life goal is for your papers to have many  Vox Charta votes, you bettwer work in the extragalactic topics. It also seems that is beneficial to have many authors on your papers, as seen on the Figure above which shows correlation between number of votes and number of authors on the paper. I have dashed the area where there are more then 10 paper per one point. Beyond that, there are only very few papers in each bin so any statistical statements are pretty weak.


It also seems it is good to write longer abstract, hopefully because authors have a lot of smart thing to say. As before, dashed shows area where there are more then 10 papers per point. There seems to be increase to around 250 words (abstract limit for many papers) after which there is stabilization trend and possible decline.

So, summarizing our conclusions from the first post and this one, to get a lot of votes, work in extragalactic topics, submit your paper so it on top of astro-ph list (competition is lowest on Tuesday), get a lot of co-authors and write long abstracts (possibly also do good science, but this is only based on anecdotal evidence).

Our Daily Vox Charta

Vox Charta has over last few years become one of more prominent tools in every astronomers arsenal. For those who might be unfamiliar with the concepts like Vox Charta and arXiv, very shortly, on Vox Charta website members of the participating academic institutions can “upvote” or “downvote” papers that have appeared on the Internet (arXiv). Idea is that people will upvote papers that they found interesting and want to talk about on the next discussion session in the department. Everybody can see how many votes a paper has received and one can easily see which papers are “hottest” i.e. which have spurred most interest in the astro community. Let’s see how does the number of votes on Vox Charta in the 2014 correlate with some other parameters!

Above we see that publication position of the paper strongly correlates with the number of votes above position 20 on the arXiv list (Lines show poor broken power-law fit to the data, done with “eyeballing” method). Below position 20 trends seems to stabilize. Scatter increases at very high numbers simply because there are very few days when 60+ papers are published. Interestingly, first position does not mean also the largest number of votes. It is important to note that there is significant number of papers that tend to be first on the list but were not actually first ones to be submitted after the deadline; they were usually submitted day or so before and I assume that there was some problem which caused them to be published with delay through moderator action.


Different days of the week spur different number of votes. Day with most activity seems to be Wednesday and the slowest day is Monday. It also seems that astrophysicists like to upvote papers more in the middle of the week. Even thought there is some difference it is only at about 20% level.


This difference is largely driven by the number of papers that are published each day. Papers published on Tuesday seem to be having lowest number of votes and Tuesday also seems to be only significant outlier.


Distribution of votes is highly non-uniform. In plot above, we show cumulative distribution of votes that papers receive. So, for instance one can see that almost 40% of papers receive no votes, and around 80% of papers receive 5 or less. Having 10 votes is already being in the top 10%, while cca 18 votes are needed to break top 5%.



Ok, so if one wants to be on the top of the arXiv list and (perhaps) have a better chance of getting more votes, how quickly should should the paper be submitted?

We show three lines which show different speeds of filling up. In blue, results are shown for 10% days which have reached 20 papers submitted the quickest. In orange mean is shown and in green we show results for slowest 10% of days.

On average, submitting in around 20 seconds after deadline will secure one of first five positions. After initial rush is over in cca 1 minute, things slow down considerably.


Ok, so you want to be first on the list. How quick do you have to be to succeed in that mission? Data shows that in order to have 50% probability of success paper has to be registered by arXive in the first second and this has no strong dependence on the day of the week when the paper is published. This does not take into account the before mentioned effect, that even if you submit first you might not get first place, because of moderator’s action.


Being in top 5 is somewhat easier and shows stronger day dependence As one can see above, submitting within first 20 seconds should place the paper in the first 5 positions. Competition is much weaker for Monday and Tuesday submissions then for other days of the week.